Friday, December 25, 2009

So do I


So do I [1]

Silently, you hand me a flower;
Softly, you smile at night.
You say—
The silver night will pass and I will die;
No man can ever last forever but tonight.
Open your mind and see what I sign!
Why is a flower, not a mind?
Why is a smile, not a cry?
O, we long blind our sight by opening our eye;
O, close your eye and see what I sign—
The world is a flower, and so do I;
The world is a smile, and so do I!
There will be endless time;
There will be endless night.
And so do I.

[1] I wrote this verse for the memory of the Buddha's nirvana


我亦如是

默默地,您递給我一朵花;
輕輕地,您望夜失笑。
您說--
這银色的夜晚正消逝,我也將離去;
没人可以天長地久,但今晚。
敞開你的心扉我神意在!
為何是一朵花,不是一顆心?
為何是一个微笑,不是哭泣?
啊,睁開雙眼我们看到了黑暗,
閉上眼睛,你才能明了真意--
這个世界是一朵花,我亦如是;
這个世界是一个微笑,我亦如是。
時間是如此地無窮;
夜晚是如此地無盡;
而我亦如是。

Friday, December 11, 2009

Modernity and Global Warming




A man should hasten towards the good,
And should keep his thought away from evil.
—The Buddha
[1]


Below, I will discuss how development of modern science and technology has impacted on human common life and human living environment.

Modernity and Common Life

Modernity, as Chris Barker observed, mainly relates to industrialism, capitalism, and secularization.[2] It is socially associated with three respects as follows:

(1) A certain set of attitudes towards the world, the idea of the world as open to transformation by human intervention; (2) a complex of economic institutions, especially industrial production and a market economy; (3) a certain range of political institutions, including the nation-state and mass democracy.[3]

Expect its social respects, modernity also displays in art, architecture, and so forth, and it usually reflects in these three main fields: science, technology, and secularism. Science is a disciplined research and a highly skilled technique; while technology is regarded as simply the application of science to practical ends, and it is promoted when it is used to improve the development of industries.[4] The initial motivations of secularism were quite complex and variegated, but since it was coined by British writer George Jacob Holyoake in 1800s, it has been a term that shows separating of religion from state; thus, it is critical of religious orthodoxy, and it is anti-religion; it searches for a way out of religious influence.[5]

In modern time, the development of science and technology—which from its very beginning marked a chief turning point in human history—has enormously transformed the world and human living conditions, resulted in the development of large-scale industries, and entailed major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, and transport. For example, during the early 20th century, among those great human achievements, there were three remarkable inventions: automobile, airplane and vessel, which essentially changed the world in where we live and drew nations on this planet close together to be called “Earth Village.” The appearance of modern automobile, for instance, was considered as one of the significant breakthroughs that humans had ever made. It totally changed the way humans travel and the way societies develop. Before car was invented, humankind much relied on horses as a main source of transportation, and this brought not large effects on commercial and urban extensions. The situation was gradually brought to an end when the 20th century came to be present. The large-scale production of autos at the time involved major changes of economic systems, social forms, and industrial lives. Before long, cars became indispensable; and big cities were extended speedily. As the former United Stated President Warren G. Harding said in his April 12, 1921, “Why on earth do you need to study what’s changing this country? I can tell you what’s happening in just four letters: A-U-T-O!”[6] So did the airplane and vessel. Honestly speaking—not only the past but also these days—almost every aspect of our daily life is strongly influenced by these transportations.

The two more examples I would like to give here are the inventions of computer and Internet. In the later 20th century, from 1980s to 1990s, among other immense human inventions, computer and Internet were indeed two amazing creations that humans had ever done. Computer and Internet were orderly invented in the United States, and they have caused a great revolution to the world. The invention of computer changed the way people write and the way documents are placed. It makes small rooms available to contain super-sized information. The invention of Internet, on the other hand, has greatly transformed the way people think of the future, or communicate with each other. It also has overwhelmingly transformed the traditional national defense, educational system, medical care system, business trading, purchasing means, and so forth. Due to its wide uses, today merchants open their stores on the Internet where they significantly reduce their investments and attain higher profits. Consumers, on the other hand, order items from the Internet where they find much convenience than ever before; and, by doing so, not only do they save the time to go out to stores, but also they can compare different prices on a same item quickly and efficiently. The Internet also provides multiple accesses every moment of everyday to a vast reservoir of information and entertainment. Today one can rapidly attain news or do research work on the Internet. Take doing research work for example. Suppose that I am going to do a research paper on Jane Goodall, the primatologist, the “chimpanzee lady.” The first thing that I may do to give my research work an easier start is to go to Google.com searching for related books or articles. In doing this, I can simply type “Jan Goodall” in Google search tab, and the Web site will show me immediately that it takes only 0.40 second to have 356,000 results. Except doing research, one can also download songs or moves from certain Web sites. As a matter of fact, the Internet today has completely broken the concepts of the space-time continuum so that people can just stay at home and get whatever they want. Furthermore, through computer and Internet, humans have been encountering a fabulous age—a digital age, an age that gives humans so much hope for the future.

Above all, science is no doubt a key of our brilliant future. Humans cannot live without it today and will not live without it in the future indeed, as president Obama emphasized earlier in 2009, “Today, more than ever before, science holds the key to our survival as a planet and our security and prosperity as a nation.”[7]

Global Warming

Despite the benefits that science provides, science also brings about disadvantages to humans. While we are enjoying the conveniences that technological products offer, we are also facing the crises that technology is bringing about. For instance, when Internet offers conveniences, it also creates different kinds of crimes—crimes such as “phishing, credit card frauds, bank robbery, illegal downloading, industrial espionage, child pornography, kidnapping children via chat rooms, scams, cyberterrorism, creation and/or distribution of viruses, spam and so on.”[8] Things like these have become a serious global issue. But, among those disadvantages, as to a personal believe, the over developing of industries—which narrowly focuses on economic system, extensively ignores ecosystem, and callously sees the items of nature (such as lands, rivers, mountains, forests, and so on) as objects that can be brought or sold—has been causing a serious threat to human living environment which is known as “climate change,” or “global warming” today.

Global warming was first alerted by Roger Revelle in 1950s, when the time most of scientists did not recognize that the use of fossil fuels had caused big problems to environment, Revelle began to study “the levels of carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere by humans burning fossil fuels,” and he was the first person to argue that global warming is man-made—climate change is a result of human activity.[9] In fact, in the later 1960s, people already altered that since the industrial revolution was started, the industrial development had become more and more relaying on fossil fuels; and this had resulted in producing considerable carbon dioxide (CO2) to our environment. And, since the first Earth Day in 1970, ecologists have warned that the “world teeters on the edge of an environmental disaster.”[10]

Although awareness about global warming is now evident among the public and policy makers, the problem, however, continues to grow and seems not to be stopped; although there are groups such as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Action Plan on Climate Change, and so on trying to offset the global warming, rising foundations to help developing countries building relative projects to reduce missions. But, comparing to the growing of CO2 every year, it is still awfully small. As Stuart A. Kallen observes,

In May 2008 the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced that CO2 levels were at a record high. Carbon dioxide had increased to 387 ppm, up almost 40 percent since the industrial revolution began and the highest level for at least the last 650,000years. And experts predicted a 10 percent rise in greenhouse gas emissions by 2010 rather than the 5.2 percent reduction called for in the Kyoto Protocol.[11]

In order to reduce the producing of CO2, the NOAA has tried so hard to make global warming regulations with big CO2 producing companies around the world to reduce missions, but because of the power of selfishness, most of the companies do not agree with what the NOAA has asked them to do so (to reduce greenhouse gas). To give an example, in the United States, the politically powerful industries such as oil companies, coal producers, steelmakers, and automobile manufacturers constantly insists that they have “employed millions of people across the country and were concerned that global warming regulations would raise the cost of doing business. This would not only threaten profits but force companies to lay off workers, creating widespread unemployment.”[12] By doing so, the companies usually refuse to reduce the missions, and they frequently spend considerable money to media, lobbyists and policy makers to affect on the environmental policies. As Stuart has observed, in 2007, the oil industry in the United States spent $83 million to lobbyists and politicians to convince lawmakers to support its interest; in 2008 General Motors, Ford, and Chryslers together gave more than $15 million to senators and congressman and spent another $50 million on lobbyists who can make pressure to legislatures and other government officials.[13]

So far, climate change has increased risks not only to environment but also to the global economy, ecology, and human health and well-being. As the 2007 “National Security and the Threat of Climate Change” warned as follows,

Climate change acts as a threat multiplier for in stability in some of the most volatile regions of the world. Projected climate change will seriously exacerbate already marginal living standards in many Asian, African, and Middle Eastern nations, causing widespread political instability and the likelihood of failed states. Unlike most conventional security threats that involve a single entity acting in specific ways and points in time, climate change has the potential to result in multiple chronic conditions, occurring globally within the same time frame. Economic and environmental conditions in already fragile areas will further erode as food production declines, diseases increase, clean water becomes increasingly scarce and large populations move in search of resources. Weakened and failing governments, with an already thin margin for survival, foster the conditions for internal conflicts, extremism, and movement toward increased authoritarianism and radical ideologies.[14]

As to this case, to some extent, some defense experts believe today that climate change can also be linked to potential conflicts between nations. They have warned public that there might be political unrest and bloodshed battles in numerous badly hit countries on account of climate change: "There is every reason to believe that as the 21st century unfolds, the security story will be bound together with climate change," warns John Ashton, a veteran diplomat who is now the United Kingdom's first special envoy on climate change.[15] “Over the next few years, we may find that climate-change accords and peace treaties start to overlap more and more. And we may find that global warming is heating new conflicts up to the boiling point,” warns James R. Lee, who runs American University's Inventory of Conflict and Environment project.[16]

Facing the urgency to reduce missions and greenhouse gas, On March19, 2009, the United States President Barack Obama addressed that Americans now have a choice: either to remain one of the world's leading importers of foreign oil or to make renewable energy; either to let climate change continue to go unchecked or to help stop it.[17] Followed by the President’s speech, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act included more than $80 billion in clean energy investments for renewable energy projects such as producing electricity from wind, wave, and ocean currents, creating new jobs in the clean energy economy, investing in the next generation of energy technologies, breaking dependence on oil, closing the carbon loophole, and so forth.[18] As to his first concern, Even on November 16, 2009, President Obama spoke of issues of clean energy and climate change when held “Town Hall” with Chinese youth in Shanghai, China. He believes that China and the United States are the two biggest countries of producing of CO2 in the world and that, by deeply looking into the coming future, the two nations’ cooperation to develop the renewable technologies will be essential and effective to other nations around the world to do the same efforts so.[19]

Conclusion

As a Buddhist monastic, I am quite marveled in modernity itself. But, to my superficial understanding of the problem, not only can modernity draw us to a spectacular gate of the future, it can also draw us to a bottomless abyss (that might swallow up human species in the very near future if we are not so watchful for what we are doing today). French philosopher René Descartes (1596–1650) used to believe, “Je pense, donc je suis” (I think, therefore I am here). The Buddha also used to say,

All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts. If a man speaks or acts with an evil thought, pain follows him, as the wheel follows the foot of the ox that draws the carriage.
All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts. If a man speaks or acts with a pure thought, happiness follows him, like a shadow that never leaves him
.[20]

Personally speaking, I deep in mind agree with what the Buddha and René Descartes observed. What we have thought and acted will produce consequences in the near future; and the global warming—which is entailed by humans—should be a lesson to us, I think. To repair the issue, we need to work together and be aware of our thoughts towards our actions. Otherwise, the ecosystem itself can change its own course to eliminate the human species and raise a new species instead of humans to walk on this planet.


Notes

[1] Trans. F. Max Muller, Wisdom of the Buddha: The Unabridged Dhammapada (America: Dover Publications, Inc., 2000), 15
[2] See Chris Barker, Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice ( London: Sage, 2005), 444
[3] Anthony Giddens, Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity (California: Stanford University Press, 1998), 94
[4] See Trevor I. Williams, Science: A History of Discovery in the Twentieth Century (London: Oxford University Press, 1990), 8
[5] See Rajeev Bhargara, Secularism and Its Critics (London: Oxford University Press, 2005), 31-2
[6] Randall E. Stross, Technology and Society in Twentieth Century America: An Anthology (America: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1989), 126
[7] Quoted in Stuart A. Kallen, How Should the World Respond to Global Warming? (America: 2010 ReferencePoint Press, Inc., 2009), 52
[8] Helen P. Macasaet, “Cybercrime against Women: Extent and Prevention,” available at http://www.women.or.kr/unesco/2007unescomaterial/session2/Dr.%20Helen%20P.%20Macasaet.pdf
[9] Stuart A. Kallen, How Should the World Respond to Global Warming? (America: 2010 ReferencePoint Press, Inc., 2009), 11
[10] Ed. David L. Bender&Bruno Leone, The Environmental Crisis: Opposing Viewpoints (America: Greenhaven Press, 1991), 17
[11] Stuart A. Kallen, 23
[12] Ibid. 16
[13] Ibid. 44-5
[14] Gordon R. Sullivan et al, “National Security and the Threat of Climate Change,” The CNA Corporation, 2007, available at http://securityandclimate.cna.org
[15] James R. Lee, “Global Warming Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg,” Washington Post, January 4, 2009, available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/02/AR2009010202280.html
[16] Ibid.
[17] The White House “Energy & Environment” March 2009, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/energy-and-environment
[18] Ibid.
[19] See video, “President Obama Holds Town Hall with Chinese Youth,” available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/china-town-hall
[20] F. Max Muller, 1

Thursday, October 1, 2009

转:耶稣年轻时在印度学习过六年佛法——已经拍成电影

來自:http://www.xici.net/b801387/d100063710.htm

圣经中关于耶稣12岁到30岁之间的记录只有一段话:耶稣的智慧和身量,并神和人喜爱他的心,都一齐增长。
(And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.) (新约 -- 路加福音(Luke) -- 2:52). 那么这些年耶稣在哪儿呢,他在干什么呢?为什么圣经不记载呢?

俄国贵族诺托维奇在1894年表示在喜马拉雅山脚下拉达克的赫米斯寺院(法戒寺)里亲自读到两卷西藏经书,记载着耶稣在14岁时因为逃婚而随同商人来到印度地区学习6年,后来又到尼泊尔继续学习佛法6年。

此后至少有七批基督教徒去法戒寺实地考察证实了“耶稣曾到印度西藏学习过六年佛法”。

下面是维基百科中关于 耶稣与佛法的关系记载:

耶稣与佛教 http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-hans/%E8%80%B6%E7%A8%A3

由于耶稣在12岁至32岁之间的事迹并没有在任何经典中提及,因此引来了后人的猜测。有人指当时的耶稣与家人前往埃及避祸,但以新约全书内有关埃及的记载,似乎难以符合这个说法。有耶稣曾经到印度学佛一说,并拍摄了电影《水徒行纪》。根据这份由新世纪运动者Levi H. Dowling宣称由灵视观看阿卡西记录的《水徒行纪》记载了耶稣在这段真空期间的事情,耶稣经由当时是罗马帝国一部份的小亚细亚,然后路经安息王朝的波斯及刚刚统一的贵霜帝国,然后才抵达印度及西藏等佛教圣地,在那里居住学习佛法约十年,才再经由波斯返抵以色列[27][28]。然而却有错误资讯将此书传为由伯多禄所写并被视为伪经的书。 [29]俄国贵族诺托维奇早在1894年表示在喜马拉雅山脚下拉达克的赫米斯寺院里亲自读到两卷西藏经书,记载着耶稣在14岁时随同商人来到印度地区学习 6年,后来又到尼泊尔继续学习佛法6年[27][30]。另外有一说指出耶稣钉上十字架后没有死去,而且移居印度,后来在克什米尔定居,并在斯利那加去世[27]。科幻小说作者Paul Davids便是采用了这个题材而制作了《耶稣在印度》(Jesus in India)这部电影[31]。现在斯利那加中有一个耶稣的墓穴供各大宗教的信徒敬拜。[32]

到了2007年,又有一位德国的亚洲研究博士生Christian Lindtner出版了一本名为《Geheimnisse um Jesus Christus》的书。在书里,Lindtner比较了希腊文版本的四福音书与巴利文及梵文的佛经内容。他的研究结果是:四福音书其实透过了各种手段,诸如利用了希伯来字母代码(gematria)的数值、双关语及同音字等来把古老的佛经内容重新包装。这个研究结果引起了正反双方的激辩。

实地考察发现“耶稣曾到印度西藏学习佛法”的都是基督教徒,而不是佛教徒。佛教徒冯冯居士记载了这个历史如下。

“冯冯:耶稣基督在印度西藏足迹的追寻 ” http://www.xinfajia.net/content/view/6202.page

1. 1887 年俄国作家兼旅行记者尼古拉斯.诺托维茨来到拉达克邦国的首府列赫(Leh)市郊二十五英里左右的一座佛教寺院,名叫希米斯(Himis),即『法戒寺』, 他费尽周折, 终於看到两厚卷因年久而发黄的按西藏传统的颂诗体写成的经卷, 记载着伊萨(耶稣的异译)在14 岁时, 耶稣十四岁父母为之聘妇,耶稣夜遁,参加商队东行,到达印度师事婆罗门祭司学法六年,后来改学佛法六年。……然后六年间,他来往于王舍城,卡西 (Kasi)等各处佛教圣地,然后,他前往参拜佛陀诞生圣地卡彼拉瓦斯土(Kapilavastu),在彼处,他追随佛教僧人六年之久,学习巴利文及研读佛经。

然后,他遍游尼泊尔与喜玛拉雅山,然后西返,他经过波斯,拜火教之地,( Earathustra)……
他的声名已经遍传遐迩。他返回本国以色列之时,年方二十九岁,他旋即开始向国人弘扬和平博爱之道……
伊萨在以色列被钉十字架殉教之后,大约三四年,乃有巴利文写成之伊萨行状文献问世,乃系根据曾经接触过伊萨之藏人、印人、商旅、及目击伊萨被以色列人钉十字架者……等人之证言写成。

2. 原籍印度的英人史弯米.阿喜达南达(Swami Abhedananda),阿氏于一九二一年七月,从旧金山乘船往印度,一九二二年,年已五十六岁的阿氏,率领一批学者,专程前往西藏法戒寺,探查伊萨传说一案。阿氏文章叙述同行众人均平安到达法戒寺,阿氏询问该寺主持及各主要喇嘛有关俄人诺氏之故事是否属实,阿氏日记这样写:『余从彼等获得答案,诺氏故事全部属实!』 阿氏获准请译员将伊萨经译为英文,列入他著作内一并出版,后来经学者鉴定,大意均相近诺氏一昼所载伊萨的经译文。

3. 俄人,名为尼古拉斯.罗厄烈冶(Nicholas Roerich),罗氏夫妇与一子佐治及六位友人,一共九人,组成探险团,于一九二四年至一九二八年间,遍游西藏、新疆、喀玛昆仑山脉、喜玛拉雅山、阿尔泰山、戈壁沙漠、甘肃、克什米尔、拉达克、潘闸、锡金……等各地,并专程去列城法戒寺查询伊萨经卷,一路考察民俗,做笔记,罗教授将旅游见闻写成很多本书,

罗教授的『亚洲心脏地带』书中说:『在殊零那格(SRINAGAR──注西巴基斯坦接近拉达克边境之城) ,我们就初次听到耶稣基督曾来过该地的传说,稍后,我们发现这种传说多么广泛流传于印度,拉达克邦国,乃至中央亚细亚,都传说耶稣失踪年代就是来了此等地带。』

罗氏说:『伊萨活佛的传说,流行于克什米尔,拉达克,蒙古和新疆,佛教喇嘛很多都知道此一传说,各说大同小异,共同点就是:耶稣的失踪年代就是来了印藏极亚地区。』罗氏在法戒寺黑暗角落找到了『伊萨经卷』,他的长子佐治精通藏文,又有藏僧洛氏同行,因此可以直接从经卷翻译,无需依赖译员,罗氏等发现的伊萨经卷,译文载于罗氏著作『喜玛拉雅』一书内,内容与诺氏著作『耶稣佚史』相近,无甚重大差异。

4.一九三九年夏天,伊萨经卷才又重新引起世界注目。该年,有一对瑞士籍的音乐家夫妇卡斯柏里教授与其夫人来到列城法戒寺,卡夫人对伊萨经卷拍了照片留念,后来带回瑞士。在她八十五岁那年 (一九八四或八五年,未详考)。将照片交给美国一位基督教女作家予以公开发表,引起国际学者注意。

5.一九五一年,美国最高法院大法官之一,威廉.德格勒斯(William Douglas)曾往印度旅行,一访法戒寺,返美后发表『喜玛拉雅山后』(BEYOND THE HIGH HIMALAYAS)一书,其中一段称:

『拉达克省(邦国)的希米士大寺(法戒寺)仍是该地最引人入胜之观光所在,该寺年代久远,甚多传奇,其中之一为传说耶稣十四岁时曾来该地,二十八岁始离去西返祖国,从此断绝音讯,传说耶稣来法戒寺之时,名字为伊萨。』

6. 一九七五年,美国加州大学诺烈治分校人类学教授拉维兹博士(Dr. Roberts.Ravice.UC-North Ridge)往访列城。拉博士到了法戒寺,曾目击伊萨经卷,并得闻口译经文,内容与诺着相同。

7. 一九八四年秋出版的美国加州旅行家兼地理学家,当时已高龄八十九的挪亚克(Edward F. Noack)先生笔记『在亚洲高原的冰雪与游牧民族中间』(Amidst Ice & Nomads In High Asia)亦提及曾于一九七○末年访问列城法戒寺经过,他说当时询问寺僧,一位喇嘛告以确有伊萨经卷锁藏于经楼,该经卷叙述耶稣曾到达拉达克邦国研究佛法。挪克先生是大英皇家地理研究会会员,亦是美国加州科学学会的会员(California Academy Of Science ),素有令誉,他与夫人于一九五八年起至一九八四年之间,曾作十八次探险研究旅行于西藏、尼泊尔、锡金、不丹、拉达克、阿富汗、中国西北等各地与土耳其斯坦,并曾四次访游列城,他的报导笔记,一向翔实可靠。

如果 耶稣 真的学习过佛法,那么说明基督教和佛家的关系还是很密切的,下面这个说法就很有可能了:
[原创]季羡林:佛家的弥勒佛就是基督教的弥赛亚

http://club2.cat898.com/newbbs/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=2&ID=2911805

注:主要证据是法戒寺的伊萨经,记录了耶稣(伊萨活佛)在印度地区学习六年佛法的过程。

Sunday, August 23, 2009

七月盂蘭盆


[普告。夫釋迦八十示寂,傳心法于後世。顯真如、追無爲也,命之成體,載化三界,而自覺覺他。非乘非分,妙思爲力;通會之際,人法兩亡焉!曰標、曰本,皆示顯也;宜明者,知自遠神。]

每年的七月有盂蘭盆法會。

中國的傳統,寺院裏必要於十五日誦《盂蘭盆經》,施放瑜伽焰口,或大蒙山。

大蒙山比較簡單。

而放瑜伽焰口,要禮請金剛上師。看情形而定,有一大士,兩大士,或三、四、五、六大士(金剛上師)的。

七位金剛上師同時施瑜伽焰口的法會少見了,我出家十年來也僅在韶關南華寺讀養正院時遇到過一次。一般現在國内的大叢林,有放三大士、五大士焰口的,而在美國,天南地北,上下求索,就三大士也不易籌齊。

古時的傳統,每次施放瑜伽焰口,都要寫《普告十方》文,説明施食的緣起,及其意義。而《告》文一般被貼于大殿兩廂走廊的牆壁上。待法會結束時再揭下來化(燒)掉。

我在北京佛學院讀書時曾到過八大處,在佛牙塔下放過三大士的焰口,記憶中好像見到了寫的不錯的《告》文。到美國後放過幾次一大士的焰口,每次也寫《告》文,但縂覺的不理想,比之國内的,要簡略了許多!

Friday, August 14, 2009

佛光淨苑





達空法師早年向佛,及至晚年捨俗出家。雖年事已高,學佛法于邊地,卻汲汲不忘弘佛教于西域,救眾生于倒懸,全身總現大悲王!彼行彼願,令人讚嘆。近日,其在紐約華爾街作股票証卷交易的女婿女兒為法師在三藩市購得民宅一所,以爲供養,做十方道場,亦盡孝道!法師與餘相識,同門道友,彼于日前來洛杉磯,餘喜其之來,故書字一幅相贈焉。

Monday, August 3, 2009

弘扬传统文化 祈愿世界和平

作者:刘长乐 (凤凰卫视控股有限公司董事局主席、行政总裁)


众所周知,这是一个并不安宁的世界,每个角落,都充满了竞争和挑战。因此,当刚性的世界给人们的物质生活提供了纷繁的享受时,也给人们的精神生活带来了沉重的负担。如何化强为弱,使人心小世界社会大世界充满平衡与祥和,遂成为当前有识之士关注的焦点。当此之时,在这里召开佛教界构建和谐社会的主题盛会,我以为意义十分重大。今天,我将从佛教和中国本土文化的历史关系、佛教对消解仇恨构建平和世界的积极贡献以及佛教在沟通不同区域民众时能发挥的特殊粘合作用等三个方面,浅谈我对佛教文化的认知,与大家共勉。
佛教最重要的意义是和儒道融合共同撑起中华文化的灿烂文明  

如同任何一个文明的兴起,都曾依托于科技和宗教一样,恢弘的华夏文明,同样是建立在儒释道三教基础之上的。佛教虽发源印度,但自汉代传入中国开始,很快便能跻身于中华文化之林,是有其特殊的历史原因的。抛开战争带来民间疾苦,百姓可以从佛教得到心灵寄托这些宗教诉求的原因不谈,仅从文化的角度看,佛教之“贵清虚”与道教之“尚无为”,佛教戒杀生、偷盗、邪淫、妄语、饮酒之“五戒”与儒家仁、义、礼、智、信之“五常”,均有共通之处,这些文化的共生点都为佛教迅速在中国落地生根提供了土壤。及至唐朝,唐太宗推行以儒教治世、佛教治心、道教养身的三教并行政策,标志着佛教基本完成了外来文化被本土文化的吸纳和重构,成为了中国传统文化的血脉和根系之一。这种三教一家的新文化特性,被后人称之为中和性。而“中和”,正是中华民族文化精神的精髓,绵延数千年,不仅为国人提供了哲学体系,提供了道德规范,也提供了彼此相认的文化血缘。

然而,自“五四”运动以来,到“文化大革命”为止,生活在中国大陆的人们,由于战争和政治运动等原因,饱受外来文化尤其是科技进步的冲击,对传统文化的态度,批判大于继承,“破”大于“立”,不仅打倒“孔家店”,砸掉寺庙,还将一批批承载着传统文化内涵的书籍作品和优秀人才也都逐步毁掉。这种连根拔起、洗澡水和孩子一起倒掉的做法带来巨大的伤害。

当每个人都开始饱受文明毁坏的伤害,当20多年的改革开放已经基本解决了温饱问题,当社会开始出现贫富两极分化,当全球化从经济到文化毫不遗漏地把中国裹挟的时候……人们对核心价值的构建开始日渐急切,继而对传统文化也开始了重新认知。这几年,韩剧和韩流之所以能风靡中国,就是因为他们用儒学的精髓,重启了国人的文化记忆,满足了受众的心灵饥渴。人们对传统文化的呼唤,其实就是呼唤那些能够契合时代脚步的儒家核心价值的回归,也是呼唤佛教人心向善、济世情怀、淡泊名利、克己奉献精神的回归。由此,“儒教治世、佛教治心、道教养身”在经过了千年轮回后,又一次彰显出一定的借鉴价值。当此之时,把佛教中兴放在历史的、现实的和它与中华文化关系的角度去考量,就会发现有着非同一般的意义:既是传统文化复兴的需要,也是因应时代变迁应该进取的力量。 “中和”不仅能为中华民族提供和谐振兴的动力,也会为渐趋刚性的西方文明带来清新祥和的活力。  

以儒释道为基础的中华文明,有一个独特的文化特征,就是崇尚中和精神。从某种意义上说,儒家文化精神的价值取向是中和,佛家和道家文化精神的价值取向亦是中和。中和就是不具侵略性,就是中庸而不偏不倚,不激烈不极端,和合之美,这对处理当今社会人与人之间、族群与族群之间、乃至国家与国家之间的关系,有重大意义。这里我贡献一个故事给大家听,是我们《凤凰周刊》记者追踪了近半年的一个新闻事件。众所周知,河南信阳、驻马店、周口、商丘等地,是中国艾滋病的重灾区,尽管国家和地方政府已尽全力采取了一切可能的措施,社会各界也纷纷施以援手捐款捐物,但是,面对人类社会的头号杀手艾滋病,他们救助的成效并不能超越当今世界医学发明的能力。因此,在那一个个艾滋病村庄里,村民们的生活除了自艾自怜,还充斥着隔些时日村头就耸起的新坟,以及每天对自己来日不多的估算。一些不甘就这么被时间和大自然沉淀的患者,开始采取极端行为。有的病人感觉全世界都对不起他们,见了陌生人就要钱;有的则因无法承受压力而自杀;还有的选择疯狂报复社会,有滥杀无辜的,也有在国道边结伴设局,敲诈过往运输商贩的……

2005年,一个叫妙觉的比丘尼走进了这个群落;2006年1月18日,庐山东林寺派出了僧俗18人,带着3辆车10余万元的货物,在妙觉的帮助下,走访了更多的村落,给1200多患者送去了米油奶等生活用品、每人100多元人民币以及念佛机佛珠佛书等。面对东林寺的师父,没有一处艾滋村的村民不友善不欢迎。许多村民都哭了,很多一向不愿意被人拍照的村民争着要和师父合影,认真讨教佛法和念佛机的使用,连师父们路上吃便饭的一些小店,都不肯收他们的饭钱……村民们纷纷告诉那些师父:“政府的救助越来越多,我们其实也不缺吃喝,就是害怕,心里空空荡荡的,没有依靠”,“别人越到过年越欢喜,我们越到过年越心烦”,“不知道该怎么办”。师父们就从佛教的角度,当场对他们开释生死,讲心态平和不偏激不极端的重要。有的村民一再邀请他们再来,还有的热情地表示愿意捐出土地建念佛堂,上蔡甚至还有4个妇女当场跪在雪地里要求皈依……

这个故事至少揭示了三种真实:第一,佛教在中国行走的2000多年里,积淀了丰厚的人心土,其在政府和民众之间所拥有的独特而深刻的号召力和影响力,非其他任何宗教可以企及;第二,印证了佛教所倡导的哲学对消除仇恨、平衡情绪能够起到积极的作用,能为疾患者带来心灵抚慰,为社会贡献和谐,这很重要;第三,体现了寻常百姓精神生活的饥渴。不仅仅是病患者,每个人其实都需要一个能够摒除谎言、维护善良和心灵纯净的庇护所,赋予他们生活以积极的意义而不是相反,佛教恰好可以担当这个心灵环保的净化器,因为它倡导惜福和感恩,无惧无忧和无怨,能够帮助这些心灵减负,达到和乐的境界。以上是从文化的内循环看佛教在传统文化中的独立价值;从文化的外循环看,中华文化的中和精神同样是世界文明的重要组成,有着独特的积极意义。

这是一个分工越来越精细、一切按照强势的西方文明架构搭建的现代社会,以秩序和目标为中心,以竞争和效率为准则,人们的生活被强力推上了一个紧张的轨道,为了生存和发展,国家与国家之间,族群与族群之间,个人与个人之间,充满了名利的争夺和存亡的挑战。看看至今没有宁日的中东,看看发达国家与发展中国家的能源争夺战,再跨国公司的全球出击,看看我们每天工作的状态,无一不是靠力量来解决问题。世界本是一个息息相关的共同体,倘没有一点中庸之道和平和包容的精神,就其结果来说,势必导致和谐丧失,使亲历中的每个国家、族群和个人,都成为某种程度的受害者。因此,中和的东方文明对于日渐刚性的世界文明来说,是一支重要的能量补充,能够缓解因工业文明、科学理性造成的冲突与紧张,医治人们的偏见与“无明”,为世界贡献和平的因子。东方文明的中兴和走出去到全世界施加影响,已具有了紧迫性和必要性。 传统文化是连接世界华人的纽带,佛教在其中有着不可替代的作用。

凤凰卫视这些年一直致力于沟通世界华人,力图在世界上发出华人的最强音。在实现这一目标的过程中,我们发现不同国度不同政体下的华人,其价值观是非常多元的,唯一能够找到的共同之处,就是对传统文化的残存记忆。只有那些文化的基因,能够拿过来做彼此认知的中介。因此,我们深知,打造新的核心价值观必定要先以传统文化做骨血,再以西方先进文化做筋脉。如果缺了传统文化的烙印,世界华人将失去沟通的基点。在传统文化中,佛教始终占据着重要位置,也发挥着重大作用。例如,在中国大陆、港澳台及东南亚等地,佛教在社会上的影响是非常大的。就两岸关系来说,佛教就起到了不可替代的沟通作用。1997年福建湄州妈祖庙组织了“妈祖金身巡游台湾”活动,共100多天,巡游了19个县市,受到成千上万“妈祖”信徒的虔诚朝拜,轰动一时。2000年7月,台湾省台中县的“大甲妈祖”回湄洲妈祖庙的谒祖进香团规模极其庞大,随行的信众多达4000人之多。同年,达到300人以上的台胞赴湄洲的“进香团”就接近30个。这些寻根之旅,代表中国文化的血缘关系是任何人都没有办法否定的。2001年5月,湄洲妈祖金身首次直航巡游金门,实现了湄洲与金门的客运直航;7月,泉州天后宫妈祖直航澎湖进行民间民俗文化交流,亦拉开了泉州与澎湖海上直航的序幕。“妈祖文化”目前已经成为海峡两岸交流的重要桥梁和精神纽带。2002年2月,凤凰卫视全程参与了大陆西安法门寺佛指舍利赴台湾的盛事,在台的37天里,台湾各界人士从高官到百姓迎送瞻仰者超逾百万人次,香火鼎盛之势空前绝后。不仅仅是张扬了中华传统文化特有的亲和力、凝聚力和感召力;更充分展现出海峡两岸人民的“精神共享”和“文化同源”。佛指在台期间,曾有台独势力巧施微词,妄图染指这一民 间圣事,结果立即招来舆论的强烈批评与反击,使得滋事者不得不嘎然而止,旋即隐匿消遁。而台湾花莲慈济医院更多次组织对大陆白血病患者捐赠骨髓的活动,同样赢得了大陆民众对台湾同胞的感激和尊敬,拉近了两岸人民的距离。通过血与血的融合,注解了两岸同族同宗血脉相连的血缘关系。以上这一切,都表明了佛教对两岸文化交流及促成祖国和平统一大业,有着特殊的、重要而积极的作用。

因此,在我们探讨振兴中华建设和谐社会的今天,我们要呼吁全社会,在以经济建设为重心 的同时,还要重视和加强传统文化的重建与张扬,以期为道德规范提供依据,为两岸统一提 供认知基础,为世界华人提供不朽的精神家园。

Saturday, August 1, 2009

守望的心





青籐爬過
褐紅的籬笆;
夕陽倒在
狹長的臉龐;
風雨萎縮了
寬闊的肩膀;
歲月鼓起了
層層的死皮。
孤單的屹立,
分離的世界。
小小的裂縫
淌下漣漪的淚光,
瑩瑩漉漉在心房。
風沙沙的手
牽動了瀲灧的密葉。
無聲的世界裏,
青籐垂下輕柔的身。




靜謐潼關外,
莽莽河西内。
走廊的盡頭傳來了
駝隊的鈴聲;
風沙朦朧
一襲黃色的袈裟;
嘯嘯的是
飛轉的經輪:
唵嘛呢叭彌吽。
籬笆那邊——
黃沙僧人,
拔出鞘中文殊劍
狂風飛沙走,
冷冷一道光
明明一條電,
削出浮雕的美。
青籐邊下
夕陽躍動守望的心……